*Today is 7 May 2006. Time now is 8pm. Entry postdated to avoid my layout from going haywire*
WARNING: PLS EXIT IF U'RE NOT THE ESSAY READING TYPE. Its too long for u to handle!
"Moscovici claimed that majority influence in many ways was misleading ? if the majority was indeed all-powerful, we would all end up thinking the same. Drawing attention to the works of Gabriel Tarde, he pointed to the fact that most major social movements have been started by individuals and small groups (e.g. Christianity, Buddhism, the Suffragette movement, Nazism, etc) and that without an outspoken minority, we would have no innovation or social change" - Copied and Pasted from Wikipedia on Serge Moscovici
Conformity is the degree to which members of a group will change their behavior, views and attitudes to fit the views of the group.
The group can influence members via unconscious processes or via overt peer pressures on individuals.
Group size, unanimity, cohesion, status, prior commitment and public opinion all help to determine the level of conformity an individual will reflect towards his group. - Copied and pasted once again from Wikipedia on Conformity
How apt it was that my Psycho lecturer was going thru Social Influence this morning. This is so going to help me remember for my Psycho exam come end May.
Yesterday, aka Polling Day, aka The Big Day for Singaporeans, was spent studying frantically for my Sociology exam after which I was glued to CNA for the results (Even thou my ward went uncontested). GE2006 went the landsliding the same way as GE2001, Low and Chiam retained their wards, but with increased support. 82 seats to PAP, 2 seats to Opposition.
Politics wasnt my time-abuser in the past when I couldnt vote/was not exposed to Sociology, Psychology and Economics/dun surf news sites. This GE 2006 is procrastinating my Sociology revision! Ok Ok, at least I'm practicing my essay-writing, debating and theory application of my Sociology, Psychology and Economics at the same time. (Self-consolating...)
I wasnt particularly interested in post-result press conference, since there's nothing exciting anymore after the results are released. But bcos our media is so monopolized, every channel, other than Channel U, which was already closed, I switched, I saw Mr PM. Y didnt anyone broadcast the press conferences of the Opposition? The statements they'll release after losing could be news-worthly too! Like the "undemocratic voting" (below). (Actually I din know if they did show any other press conference after 2.40am, which is the time I got bored with the issue repeatings and off the TV but I assume they didnt.)
N do we need that many channels to see one single press conference at 2 in the morning? It jus goes to show how Pro-Active they Position themselves. Y choose to give us selected coverage/info and not give us the full picture, Ruling Party AND Opposition? Isnt media supposed to bring us total coverage?
Our Tagline "Providing Asian Perspectives"
WHAT WE BELIEVE
Viewers today are overloaded by information. Often, what they need is not just news, but understanding. Not just events of the moment, but issues which affect their lives. Not just headlines, but bottomlines. Not just another perspective from a distance, but insights from the inside. With correspondents based in major cities throughout the region, Channel NewsAsia is created for Asians by Asians
- Taken from CNA
Where is the insights from inside Opposition? Unless access to info is restricted(But u're the MEDIA! U're able to widespread their statements! They will be too happy to have u ard!), the media shld be able to inform the public!
Opposition = Competition. Competition is good. It engineers social change. Lets compare the progress of a walkover ward (E.g. Hong Kah) and a contested ward (E.g. Potong Pasir). The walkover ward gets its upgrading projects going in due course while the contested ward gets more money for more upgrades (Unless the ruling party treats the opposition ward as not belonging to Singapore - Whatever happened to One People, One Nation, One Singapore?).
Competition oso brought extra income back into our pockets (Budget surplus refers to the excess money that was collected by the govt thru taxes, fees, etc and was not used). Assuming if there was no contests, govt would be redirecting a higher % of surpluses to foreign investments rather than consumption as it provides a higher payout (GDP = private consumption + government + investment + net exports).
But the govt subsidy would eventually be returned back to the economy and spark a temporary economy growth thru increased consumption, thus beautifying the next quarter's growth report.
Foreign political analysts and several opposition parties including the Workers' Party of Singapore and the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) have argued that Singapore is a de facto one-party state. Many consider the form of government in Singapore to be closer to authoritarianism such as illiberal democracy or procedural democracy rather than true democracy. Reporters Without Borders ranked Singapore 140th out of 167 countries in its 2005 Worldwide Press Freedom Index. It has also been alleged that the PAP employs censorship, gerrymandering and the filing of civil suits against the opposition for libel or slander to impede their success. - Copied and pasted from Wikipedia
I salute the Hougang and Potong Pasir residents for supporting the Opposition even thou the voting slips are serial marked to increase obedience. This is an example of consistency in minority influence. Chiam and Low had secured their place in Potong Pasir and Hougang respectively through commitment initially, then as a recognised figure, representing the residents in their wards actively.
The 6 brave kamikaze workers had also won in another definition. They gave Mr PM the lowest winning margin for PMs given that they are in fact, young and inexperienced, and can impact Mr PM's confidence so deep that he starts to blabber, hesitates his speech and becomes shaky. I wonder if Mr PM lost his ward, will he still be the PM?
The close Aljunied fight was the most exciting to watch. Its a 44% for the Opposition. That's 6% to a deunce. The small winning % could be attributed to Cynthia Phua, who was always going ard, election or not, with her family building rapport with the residents as stated by a resident. (I DUN SEE MY MP WALKING ARD!! I NVR EVEN SEEN HER IN PERSON LOR!)
And the strong turnout for WP's rally, was yet another minority effectiveness eg. Sylvia Lim, thru this GE, had convinced, gained acceptance and established her recognition with 44% of Aljunied residents. Its already a big win for the minorities. Long run, they might win this GRC if boundaries remain status quo.
Regarding the Gomez thing, I was away from Singapore, so I nvr knew the whole story. After I came back, its still on Gomez Gomez Gomez and his stupid form. And following that, The Infamous Bak Chor Mee Podcast, which I nvr heard, and only know that it was from Brown and Miyagi production studios TODAY! (yup yup rather slow, considering that I regularly read their blogs. I din listen to their podcasts lah..)
Its not the 1st time that WP screwed up in Aljunied during Nomination Day anyway. They had their nominations rejected in 2001 when they declared incompletely, so wats so special this time round?
The opposition had increased support in this GE, even though they contested more wards (going by averages, less wards = less voters = each voter holds a higher %). What does it signify? People want change. Changes for the better. People are changing. People want a better voice. People want to be seen on a micro-context. People are smarter.
Focusing on winning party's post-result press conference (out of nothing else), its rather, well I'll say, claiming the victorious flag and putting down the Opposition. It was aggressively attacking the Opposition's efforts and the voters who supported the other party.
If the results of 2001 (75%) was not benchmarked upon due to terrorism threats and poor economy, was the Asian Financial Recession of 1997 or the Early 1980s Recession forgotten?
2006, our economy had already picked up and flew away. Biggest problem now would be the rising oil prices. Recession? Where??
Stop the 'OVERWHELMING' 66.6% support. Overwhelming, overwhelming, overwhelming. Its only borderline B3 and a decline from the previous election. Stop window-dressing ur results. Its 1 out of 3 people that voted the other party! Close to half! N with the aging population, the old time mindset and support is going to make way for the new young. Time to restrategize and reflect on the attitudes.
The new young, being always out of home, would require different methods to reach out to them. With internet media being so widely accepted by this target audience, they shldnt be disallowing podcasts and blogs. Society is changing, leaders need to change to react to these changes too.
Mr PM seems to be addicted to pulling down his stairs. How does he noe that most people who supported him in his ward are young people? Link to the serials n one can guess the answer, even if it might not be the answer, the serials will only make people think negatively althou it might jus be used for control and authentication purposes.
Of the 66.6% (its so satanic!), how many of these conformed interally or outwardly only? How many are influenced by the serial numbers and majority effectiveness? How many are due to OBEDIENCE?
"Exactly two-thirds of Singaporeans voted for the PAP, a margin better than what the Prime Minister had expected, which was 60-65 percent."
Shouldnt it be eligible/contested/votable Singaporeans? What abt the other half of Singapore that had been trampled over? Forsaken? Walkover wards do not get to choose. So ur population shld only consist of those contested wards. That statement would only be true IF the Opposition fields enuff people to contest the whole of Singapore.
N y is Mr PM's malay better than mandarin?? Was he excluded from the Speak Mandarin campaigns?
Marxist's social conflict theory states that individuals and groups (social classes) within society have differing amounts of material and non-material resources (the wealthy vs. the poor) and that the more powerful groups use their power in order to exploit groups with less power. In this case, the ruling party has obviously more resources (finances, media, talents, power, etc) than the minority.
Lastly, if the parliament is representative of people's choice, shouldnt it consist of 34% Oppositions, since 1 out of 3 voted for them??
Now that the excitement is over, the dust has settled, boundaries will be redrawn yet again, will there be 2 teams going ard garnering support thru addressing the needs for the next election in the same ward during the 5 yrs?
I'm waiting to see some post-results courtside action.
If there's one thing that backfired, it would be the education system. The new young got too smart.
(It was a good essay practice. But.. I need Wikipedia during exams!! And I took TOO LONG!)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SDP says poor results due to "undemocratic" elections
By Pearl Forss, Channel NewsAsia
SINGAPORE : The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has said its poor showing at the polls was due to an election which it describes as "undemocratic".
In a statement read to reporters at the SDP office at Serangoon Road, shortly after the results were announced, Ms Chee Siok Chin, said in democratic elections, the losing party would congratulate the victors and extend them its best wishes.
But she said in an election as undemocratic as this, the SDP does not concede anything to the People's Action Party (PAP).
Three reasons were cited.
The party said rules were changed and introduced before and mid-way through the elections. For example, SDP's podcast was banned.
It alleged the media waged a relentless campaign especially against the SDP.
And third, it claimed the lawsuit by Mr Lee Kuan Yew and Mr Lee Hsien Loong silenced the SDP and prevented it from engaging and questioning Health Minister Mr Khaw Boon Wan on the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) issue.
All this, it said, is over and above the fear that voters face and the vote-buying measures of the PAP through the Progress Package.
The statement went on to say the SDP would contest the next General Election and will start work now.
But when asked which area it plans to focus its efforts on, Ms Chee declined comment.
The SDP had fielded seven candidates in this election.
Mr Ling How Doong, who contested in single seat Bukit Panjang, obtained 22.82 percent of the votes, losing out to PAP's Teo Ho Ping,
The SDP's six-member team in Sembawang GRC obtained 23.3 percent of the votes cast by residents there.
Earlier, its candidate Ling walked out of a counting centre after complaining about extra table lamps in the counting hall.
He said: "You should go there, take a look at the ceiling lights, even a blind man can see with the lights, yet they put four more lights there. They put at four corners, so they start the lights and do the counting. I told them, if you don't (switch) off the lights, we are not participating in the counting, we left." - CNA/de/ch
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PM Lee calls on Singaporeans to close ranks after election
By Hwee Goh, Channel NewsAsia
SINGAPORE: It was a decisive win for the People's Action Party (PAP) in the Singapore General Election.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who received a 66.6 percent nod from Singaporeans, thanked voters for "a very strong mandate."
While two single-seat wards remained firmly in opposition hands, the PAP stopped the opposition from winning a through a Group Representation Constituency.
Mr Lee also called on Singaporeans to close ranks and move ahead.
Make Singapore a "shining red dot," he said.
Mr Lee was speaking at the 2am post-election news conference on Sunday.
Exactly two-thirds of Singaporeans voted for the PAP, a margin better than what the Prime Minister had expected, which was 60-65 percent.
Mr Lee said this was not to be compared with 2001's 75 percent because of the spectre of terrorism and a poor economy then.
Besides that year, this is PAP's best showing since 1980 and slightly higher than 1997's.
Mr Lee said: "During these nine days of campaigning, many issues have been raised, many proposals hotly argued, many passions aroused.
"Now that the elections are over, we should come together again as one people. Our unity and cohesion has been one of Singapore's key strengths and you must continue to make it so.
"But I want also to continue to encourage open debate on issues because neither the PAP nor the government nor the opposition has all the solutions and answers to problems. But we have enormous talents in Singaporeans. And each has something important to contribute. We should tap and engage this for the good of Singapore."
The Prime Minister was flanked by 9 other party members who reflected not just a cross section of representation but also a next-generation team in place.
The conference centred very much on the future, and looked ahead to "an exciting Parliament."
Mr Wong Kan Seng said: "We have a new leadership today and in Parliament, with election of 24 of them, you'll find that this parliament will comprise 80% of new MPs elected since 1997 and that is a significant change. If you consider how other countries develop, you'll find that we have continually self renewed ourselves to stay relevant and that policy must continue."
The Deputy Prime Minister also thanked overseas Singaporeans for taking part in the election, and hoped more would do so in future elections.
As for the next general election, Prime Minister Lee said it would have to depend on what is happening in the region and the world, and the new faces would have come into their own.
Mr Lee said: "We're not sitting here wondering what's going to happen, waiting for it to happen. We are going to make things happen and the way to do that is to have a strong team who can work together to make things happen.
"In the next 5 years, they will establish themselves, they will learn the ropes, they will get the hang of it. By the next election, they will be old hands, experienced, some anchor persons, key members of the team."
This begs the next question: when will a cabinet reshuffle be announced?
The Prime Minister has earlier indicated four new faces will become office holders. - CNA/ir/ls